The slider that cost a clinic its mobile visitors
A Thrissur clinic’s homepage opened with a 4-image slider. On mobile, LCP was 5.8 seconds and CLS jumped as banners loaded.
We replaced the slider with one compressed image, set image sizes and moved a chat widget to load later.
LCP dropped to 2.1 seconds and CLS to 0.03. Bounce rate fell and form submissions from mobile rose by a third.
Illustrative example based on a common pattern in Kerala e-commerce accounts. Numbers rounded.
What Core Web Vitals measure
LCP measures how long the main content takes to appear. INP measures how quickly the page responds to taps and clicks (it replaced FID in 2024). CLS measures how much the layout jumps around.
Google uses real-user data (field data) from Chrome, at the 75th percentile, mainly from mobile. Lab tests help find causes; field data decides pass or fail.
Good: LCP ≤ 2.5 s · INP ≤ 200 ms · CLS ≤ 0.1 (75% of visits)
Check your Core Web Vitals
- LCP
- Needs improvement
- INP
- Good
- CLS
- Needs improvement
The page doesn’t pass yet. Fix LCP, CLS first. LCP: compress the hero image and remove sliders. INP: cut heavy scripts and plugins. CLS: set image sizes and reserve space for banners.
Want a second opinion on your numbers? Join the community and post them for doubt-clearing.
Common causes of failing scores
| Problem | Usual cause |
|---|---|
| LCP: slow | Large hero images, sliders, slow hosting |
| INP: slow | Heavy JavaScript, too many plugins, chat widgets |
| CLS: jumpy | Images without sizes, late banners and ads |
How experienced marketers use Core Web Vitals
1. Prioritise speed work
Fix the metric that fails on your most important templates first.
2. Brief developers
Field data from Search Console shows which URL groups fail.
3. Protect conversions
Faster, stable pages usually convert better on mobile data.
What good looks like
| Business type | Starting rule | Why |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | ≤ 2.5 s good, > 4 s poor | Google’s thresholds. |
| INP | ≤ 200 ms good, > 500 ms poor | Replaced FID in March 2024. |
| CLS | ≤ 0.1 good, > 0.25 poor | Unitless score. |
When the number lies
- Lab vs field
- A great lab score doesn’t guarantee passing field data, and vice versa.
- Low-traffic pages
- Pages without enough Chrome data show only lab results or URL-group data.
Mistakes to avoid
Testing only on desktop
Mobile users, most of your traffic, get the slow experience.
Chasing a 100 score
Time spent on diminishing returns instead of conversions.
Adding plugins to fix speed
More scripts, often worse INP.
Related terms
Questions people ask about Core Web Vitals
What are Core Web Vitals?
Three metrics Google uses to measure page experience: LCP for loading, INP for responsiveness and CLS for visual stability.
Are Core Web Vitals a ranking factor?
They are part of Google’s page experience signals. Relevance and content matter more, but poor vitals can hold a page back and hurt conversions.
How do I check Core Web Vitals?
PageSpeed Insights for a single URL, and Search Console’s Core Web Vitals report for the whole site.
What replaced FID?
INP (Interaction to Next Paint) replaced FID as a Core Web Vital in March 2024.
Put it into practice
- SOP 058: Speed Up a WordPress Website →
- SOP 334: Run a Full Technical SEO Site Audit and Prioritise Fixes →
Prefer to talk first? Book a free counselling call.